Skip to content

Conversation

@thatraghavarora
Copy link

@thatraghavarora thatraghavarora commented Dec 13, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added a repository structure and file index section providing guidance on core project documents, licenses, and public resources for improved repository navigation.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 13, 2025

Walkthrough

Documentation added to README.md introducing a "Repository Structure & File Index" section that details core documents, licenses, and public assets with file paths and descriptions. The change is purely additive with no functional code modifications.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation
README.md
Added new "Repository Structure & File Index" section describing repository layout, core documents, licenses, and public assets

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

  • Single file change with purely additive documentation content
  • No code logic, functional behavior, or external dependencies introduced
  • Straightforward structural documentation that requires minimal verification

Poem

🐰 A ribbon of words, neatly sewn,
Maps every corner of this codebase home,
Structure unfolds like clover leaves wide,
Guide all visitors through with pride! 📖✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: adding a new 'Repository Structure & File Index' section to README.md, which aligns with the raw summary.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

92-100: Ensure formatting consistency in the "Public Assets" section.

Line 95 breaks the formatting pattern established in other sections. The description text should be consistently formatted across all entries. Currently, the public assets entry lacks the same structure as the core documents and licenses sections.

Consider reformatting for consistency:

 ### 🌐 Public Assets
 
 - **public/**
-  Publicly accessible assets such as logos, icons, and branding resources.
+  Publicly accessible assets such as logos, icons, and branding resources.
 
   - `public/stability.svg` — Official Stability Nexus logo
     👉 `public/stability.svg`

This aligns the public assets structure more closely with how core documents and licenses are presented.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 41a8bf0 and 67d7ce5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)

62-100: All referenced files and directories exist—no issues found.

Verification confirms that all files and directories referenced in the new "Repository Structure & File Index" section are present in the repository:

  • ✓ KYA.md, TermsAndConditions.md, COPYRIGHT.md
  • ✓ Licenses/ directory
  • ✓ public/stability.svg and public/ directory

The section is accurate and can be merged as-is.

@thatraghavarora thatraghavarora changed the title Update README.md Add Repository Structure & File Index section to README Dec 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant