Skip to content

Clarified staff token method naming#26585

Open
kevinansfield wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
rename-staff-token-methods
Open

Clarified staff token method naming#26585
kevinansfield wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
rename-staff-token-methods

Conversation

@kevinansfield
Copy link
Member

no issue

  • "token" is a very overloaded term in our codebase, this is a small step to making our naming more explicit

no issue

- "token" is a very overloaded term in our codebase, this is a small step to making our naming more explicit
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 25, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 869f49a and 3e298e9.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • ghost/core/core/server/api/endpoints/users.js
  • ghost/core/core/server/api/endpoints/utils/serializers/output/users.js
  • ghost/core/core/server/web/api/endpoints/admin/routes.js

Walkthrough

The pull request renames token-related functions and controller properties across multiple files. Specifically, fetchOrCreatePersonalToken() is renamed to fetchOrCreateStaffToken(), and the controller properties readToken and regenerateToken are renamed to readStaffToken and regenerateStaffToken respectively. Corresponding serializer methods and API endpoint routes are updated to use the new names. The signature and functionality of these methods remain unchanged; only the identifiers are updated for consistency.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Clarified staff token method naming' directly and specifically describes the main change—renaming token-related methods to be more explicit about their staff token purpose.
Description check ✅ Passed The description explains that 'token' is overloaded in the codebase and describes the PR as making naming more explicit, which aligns with the actual method renaming changes.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings (stacked PR)
  • 📝 Generate docstrings (commit on current branch)
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch rename-staff-token-methods

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant