-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49
Fix links to typescript types #144
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
I don't think those files are created though ... if you |
|
Oh, wait wait, I've notived another typescript issue. I'll try to fix it in the Pull-Request as well if you're ok. |
|
I read |
|
Definitions are either automatically generated or manually maintained… the project is a JS one … if you check previous issues are all about TS but because I’m rewriting this whole library for hopefully the last time I don’t care much about fixing this but I’d welcome a fix that works |
|
More context here: #141 |
eaa18aa to
339052e
Compare
|
Ok, Ive understand the problem. It is linked to the typescript version. In this commit :3860505#diff-7ae45ad102eab3b6d7e7896acd08c427a9b25b346470d7bc6507b6481575d519R42, the version of typescript has been changed. Since then, there is an error with the command With the new version of typescript, the line I've also reverted my other changes, there are not needed. |
|
It appear that the same problem was already solved in another Pull-Request : #142. Perhaps you can close this one and merge the other one ? Or merge this one and just close the other one, as you wish :) |
|
wait .. how is that related? 🤔 |
Hum... Not sure I understand your question... |
|
related: #145 |
|
As mentioned above, it looks like the types aren't in a working state right now since the build step only partially completes due to a type error, which is addressed by this PR. I wrote down some details in #143 (comment), the main issue being:
|
|
did latest TS related MR fix this issue too? |
|
no answer in weeks ... I take as a yes. |


Hi @WebReflection,
This should solve the problem described here: #143
I don't know if you want to upgrade the version number, I'll let this up to you.
Please tell me if something is missing.
Thanks!