style: type issues in test folder

[HelloJowet]

Description

I noticed there are quite a few type warnings and errors in this repo when running pyright. I went ahead and fixed some of the type issues in the /tests folder to help clean things up a bit.

Strong typing helps catch bugs early and makes the codebase easier to maintain in the long run.

I’d be happy to contribute more and tackle additional type problems if there’s interest. This PR is just a first step to see if it makes sense to spend more time here and maybe get more involved as a contributor.

Let me know what you think!

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @HelloJowet, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly enhances the type safety and maintainability of the project's test suite by introducing explicit type hints. The changes address existing type warnings and errors identified by pyright, making the test codebase more robust and easier to understand. This effort aims to leverage strong typing to proactively catch potential bugs and streamline future development and refactoring.

Highlights

• Type Hinting Expansion: Introduced comprehensive type hints across numerous test files to improve code clarity and enable static analysis.
• Fixture and Test Parameter Typing: Explicitly typed parameters for pytest fixtures and test functions, enhancing type safety within the test suite.
• Helper Function Annotations: Added type annotations to helper functions, ensuring consistent type checking throughout the test utilities.
• Import Refinement: Corrected an import path for InMemoryContextCredentialStore in tests/client/test_auth_middleware.py.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Warning

Gemini encountered an error creating the review. You can try again by commenting /gemini review.

[HelloJowet]

/gemini review

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request does a great job of adding type hints to the test suite, which significantly improves code clarity and maintainability. I've made a few suggestions to add some missing type hints for consistency and to remove a couple of redundant imports. Overall, this is a valuable contribution to improving the codebase's quality.

[holtskinner]

/gemini review

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This is a great initiative to improve the type safety of the test suite. The added type hints are clear and correct for the most part. I've noticed a consistent pattern where test functions that don't return a value are missing the -> None return type annotation. I've left a few comments pointing this out. Applying this annotation consistently will further improve the type coverage. Keep up the great work!

[HelloJowet]

@holtskinner Every time gemini-code-assist runs, it finds new typing issues - there are quite a few across the codebase. This PR is just a first step and I’m happy to submit more PRs to continue improving the typing.

[holtskinner]

All good with me, sending to @lkawka for final approval