Skip to content

Code Coverage: Automated coverage increase by Harness AI #13

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
ahimanshu56 wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Code Coverage: Automated coverage increase by Harness AI #13

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
37 changes: 37 additions & 0 deletions BASELINE_COVERAGE.txt
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
================================
Copy link
Owner Author

@ahimanshu56 ahimanshu56 Mar 20, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggestion: Consider not committing BASELINE_COVERAGE.txt to the repo

This file is a one-time snapshot of the pre-test state (0% coverage). Once tests are merged, this file has no ongoing value and will become confusing to future contributors. It also doesn't belong in version history as a committed artifact — it's more of a one-time diagnostic.

Recommendation: Either delete it after the PR is merged, or move it to a .github/ or docs/ directory with a clear header noting it is historical context only.

BASELINE COVERAGE REPORT
================================
Date: Before Test Implementation
Status: No tests exist yet

Coverage Report:
--------------------------------
Name Stmts Miss Cover
-----------------------------------------------------
src/__init__.py 1 1 0%
src/api/__init__.py 1 1 0%
src/api/handlers.py 89 89 0%
src/models/__init__.py 1 1 0%
src/models/user.py 58 58 0%
src/services/__init__.py 1 1 0%
src/services/user_service.py 52 52 0%
src/utils/__init__.py 2 2 0%
src/utils/math_utils.py 42 42 0%
src/utils/string_utils.py 32 32 0%
-----------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 279 279 0%

Critical Gaps Identified:
- No tests for string utility functions
- No tests for math utility functions
- No tests for User model validation
- No tests for UserService operations
- No tests for API handlers
- No edge case testing
- No error handling tests

Priority Areas:
1. User model validation (critical for data integrity)
2. UserService operations (core business logic)
3. API handlers (user-facing functionality)
4. Utility functions (widely used across application)
Loading