Create SECURITY.md #78
Conversation
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @shbaismail, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
Hello! Gemini here, providing a summary of this pull request. This PR introduces a new file, SECURITY.md, to the repository. The purpose of this file is to establish a clear security policy for the project, informing users and contributors about which versions are currently supported with security updates and providing instructions on how to report potential security vulnerabilities.
Highlights
- New Security Policy File: Adds a new file named
SECURITY.mdto the root of the repository. - Supported Versions Section: Includes a section outlining which project versions are actively supported for security updates, presented in a markdown table format.
- Vulnerability Reporting Guidelines: Provides a dedicated section explaining the process for reporting security vulnerabilities, including where to report, expected response times, and outcomes.
Changelog
- SECURITY.md
- Created new file
SECURITY.md. - Added markdown content for the security policy.
- Included sections for 'Supported Versions' and 'Reporting a Vulnerability'.
- Created new file
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
New file takes its place,
Security policy clear,
Keep the code safe now.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
Thank you for adding a SECURITY.md file! This is a crucial step for any project to define its security policies and procedures. The structure is a good starting point. However, the current content appears to be largely placeholder text, which needs to be replaced with specific, actionable information relevant to this project repository before this can be merged. My review focuses on these placeholder sections.
Summary of Findings
- Placeholder Content in Supported Versions: The 'Supported Versions' table in
SECURITY.md(lines 8-13) appears to contain placeholder data. This needs to be updated with actual, accurate information about which versions of the project's components or samples are actively supported with security updates. - Placeholder Content in Reporting a Vulnerability: The 'Reporting a Vulnerability' section in
SECURITY.md(lines 19-21) consists of placeholder text. This is a critical part of the security policy and must be replaced with specific instructions on how to report vulnerabilities, including contact details, expected information in reports, and response commitments.
Merge Readiness
This pull request introduces a SECURITY.md file, which is a positive addition. However, as the file currently contains placeholder information in critical sections ('Supported Versions' and 'Reporting a Vulnerability'), it is not yet ready for merging. These sections must be filled with accurate and actionable details specific to this project. I am unable to approve pull requests, but I strongly recommend that these changes are made before this PR is considered for merging. Other reviewers should also assess the completeness of the information once updated.
| Tell them where to go, how often they can expect to get an update on a | ||
| reported vulnerability, what to expect if the vulnerability is accepted or | ||
| declined, etc. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This "Reporting a Vulnerability" section currently contains generic placeholder text. To make this security policy effective and useful for security researchers, it needs to provide clear, actionable instructions.
Could you please replace the placeholder text with specific details? Key information to include would be:
- Where to report: A dedicated email address (e.g.,
security@your-project.com) or a link to a private issue tracker. - What to include in a report: Guidance on the information to provide (e.g., detailed description of the vulnerability, steps to reproduce, affected components/versions, potential impact).
- Expected response timeline: What reporters can expect regarding acknowledgment and updates (e.g., "We aim to acknowledge reports within X business days and provide an initial assessment within Y days.").
- Disclosure policy: Your project's stance on coordinated disclosure.
- PGP Key (Optional): If you support encrypted communication for reports, consider providing your PGP public key details.
A concrete process here is vital for handling security issues effectively.
| Tell them where to go, how often they can expect to get an update on a | |
| reported vulnerability, what to expect if the vulnerability is accepted or | |
| declined, etc. | |
| To report a security vulnerability, please email us at [REPLACE_WITH_ACTUAL_SECURITY_CONTACT_EMAIL_OR_LINK_TO_REPORTING_FORM]. | |
| Please include a detailed description of the vulnerability, precise steps to reproduce it, the affected version(s) of the project or sample application, and any perceived impact. | |
| We aim to acknowledge receipt of vulnerability reports within [e.g., 2 business days] and will strive to keep you informed of our progress. We are committed to responsible disclosure and will coordinate with you regarding public announcements if applicable. |
| | Version | Supported | | ||
| | ------- | ------------------ | | ||
| | 5.1.x | :white_check_mark: | | ||
| | 5.0.x | :x: | | ||
| | 4.0.x | :white_check_mark: | | ||
| | < 4.0 | :x: | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The "Supported Versions" table provides a good template. However, are the versions listed (e.g., 5.1.x, 5.0.x) and their support status actual data for the sample projects in this repository, or are they placeholders? It's important that this section accurately reflects which versions of the sample applications (like StepCounterKotlin, etc.) are currently receiving security updates.
Given that the README.md mentions the deprecation of Google Fit APIs, it would also be helpful to clarify if/how this impacts the support lifecycle of the sample applications themselves and reflect that here.
Could you please update this table with the correct, specific version information and support status for the projects covered by this security policy?
1 participant
No description provided.