Skip to content

Conversation

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR

Fixes: #3685 partially as unlinking an account has no good functional definition (yet)
Fixes: #11474 by removing a long time deprecated parameter

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • Build/CI
  • Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 3, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 6.06061% with 31 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 17.48%. Comparing base (f06ac51) to head (9c68433).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...loudstack/api/command/UnlinkDomainFromLdapCmd.java 0.00% 16 Missing ⚠️
...va/org/apache/cloudstack/ldap/LdapManagerImpl.java 0.00% 13 Missing ⚠️
...he/cloudstack/api/command/LinkDomainToLdapCmd.java 33.33% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #11962      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     17.48%   17.48%   -0.01%     
- Complexity    15552    15554       +2     
============================================
  Files          5913     5914       +1     
  Lines        529650   529678      +28     
  Branches      64716    64718       +2     
============================================
+ Hits          92629    92633       +4     
- Misses       426576   426601      +25     
+ Partials      10445    10444       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 3.58% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
unittests 18.55% <6.06%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds functionality to unlink a CloudStack domain from LDAP, complementing the existing linkDomainToLdap functionality. The changes also include refactoring improvements to clean up the LinkDomainToLdapCmd by removing deprecated parameters and improving logging.

Key Changes

  • Added new unlinkDomainFromLdap API command to remove domain-to-LDAP linkages
  • Removed deprecated name parameter and improved the LinkDomainToLdapCmd implementation
  • Applied minor code modernization (diamond operator, parametrized logging)

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
UnlinkDomainFromLdapCmd.java New API command for unlinking domains from LDAP
LdapManager.java Added interface method for unlinking and removed trailing semicolon from enum
LdapManagerImpl.java Implemented unlinkDomainFromLdap method and applied diamond operator refactoring
LinkDomainToLdapCmd.java Removed deprecated name parameter, made ldapDomain required, and improved logging
pom.xml Added explicit cloud-api dependency
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

plugins/user-authenticators/ldap/src/main/java/org/apache/cloudstack/ldap/LdapManagerImpl.java:308

  • The new UnlinkDomainFromLdapCmd class is not registered in the getCommands() list, which means it won't be available as an API command. Add cmdList.add(UnlinkDomainFromLdapCmd.class); before the return statement.
        final List<Class<?>> cmdList = new ArrayList<>();
        cmdList.add(LdapUserSearchCmd.class);
        cmdList.add(LdapListUsersCmd.class);
        cmdList.add(LdapAddConfigurationCmd.class);
        cmdList.add(LdapDeleteConfigurationCmd.class);
        cmdList.add(LdapListConfigurationCmd.class);
        cmdList.add(LdapCreateAccountCmd.class);
        cmdList.add(LdapImportUsersCmd.class);
        cmdList.add(LDAPConfigCmd.class);
        cmdList.add(LDAPRemoveCmd.class);
        cmdList.add(LinkDomainToLdapCmd.class);
        cmdList.add(LinkAccountToLdapCmd.class);
        return cmdList;

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Copy link
Contributor

@shwstppr shwstppr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

some comments, idea looks good. Will need testing

Copy link
Member

@vishesh92 vishesh92 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code looks good to me. Just one change is required.

Copy link
Contributor

@kiranchavala kiranchavala left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@DaanHoogland

(localcloud) 🐱 > link domaintoldap domainid=0735d7e8-5dcc-4b48-8049-81c69d8830d3 type=GROUP accounttype=2 ldapdomain=cn=qa-team,ou=Telco-Bng,dc=example,dc=in name=qa admin=admin
{
  "LinkDomainToLdap": {
    "accounttype": 2,
    "domainid": "0735d7e8-5dcc-4b48-8049-81c69d8830d3",
    "ldapdomain": "cn=qa-team,ou=Telco-Bng,dc=example,dc=in",
    "name": "cn=qa-team,ou=Telco-Bng,dc=example,dc=in",
    "type": "GROUP"
  }
}

mysql> select * from ldap_configuration;
+----+-----------+------+-----------+--------------------------------------+
| id | hostname  | port | domain_id | uuid                                 |
+----+-----------+------+-----------+--------------------------------------+
|  2 | localhost |  389 |         2 | e07853d9-73dc-4486-9acf-66937c8123a5 |
+----+-----------+------+-----------+--------------------------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

mysql> select * from ldap_trust_map;
+----+-----------+-------+------------------------------------------+--------------+------------+
| id | domain_id | type  | name                                     | account_type | account_id |
+----+-----------+-------+------------------------------------------+--------------+------------+
|  1 |         2 | GROUP | cn=qa-team,ou=Telco-Bng,dc=example,dc=in |            2 |          0 |
+----+-----------+-------+------------------------------------------+--------------+------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

Getting the following response from the api , but the entry is deleted from the database

(localcloud) 🐱 > unlink domainfromldap domainid=0735d7e8-5dcc-4b48-8049-81c69d8830d3
🙈 Error: failed to decode response

mysql> select * from ldap_trust_map;
Empty set (0.00 sec)

Also the UI progress doesn't stop when a user tried to link domain to ldap

Screenshot 2025-11-05 at 5 22 05 PM

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kiranchavala , those issues are fixed, however there are some polish issues remaining, like the condition to enable link or unlink are not available in the UI atm and I need to decide/discuss how to address these.

@apache apache deleted a comment from blueorangutan Nov 5, 2025
@apache apache deleted a comment from blueorangutan Nov 5, 2025
@apache apache deleted a comment from blueorangutan Nov 5, 2025
@apache apache deleted a comment from blueorangutan Nov 5, 2025
@apache apache deleted a comment from blueorangutan Nov 5, 2025
@apache apache deleted a comment from blueorangutan Nov 5, 2025
@apache apache deleted a comment from blueorangutan Nov 5, 2025
@rajujith
Copy link

@DaanHoogland, there is a similar use case with accounts where there are no UI options https://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.20/apis/linkAccountToLdap.html. Should this also be considered in this PR?

@kiranchavala
Copy link
Contributor

@DaanHoogland, there is a similar use case with accounts where there are no UI options https://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.20/apis/linkAccountToLdap.html. Should this also be considered in this PR?

Yes @rajujith @DaanHoogland

The improvement issue is already present

#11473

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor Author

@DaanHoogland, there is a similar use case with accounts where there are no UI options https://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.20/apis/linkAccountToLdap.html. Should this also be considered in this PR?

Yes @rajujith @DaanHoogland

The improvement issue is already present

#11473

guys (@rajujith @kiranchavala), I don’t want to add and create a big beautiful PR. I’d rather implement smaller well tested changes, if you don’t mind. We need to have a backend change in DomainResponse as well to be able to decide whether to show the link or the unlink button. I am sure we will find more issues while working on this.

Copy link
Contributor

@Pearl1594 Pearl1594 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Linking and unlinking of domain to ldap works fine, however, as an improvement to this it would be nice to selectively show and hide the link/unlink buttons based on whether the domain is linked to an LDAP or not. But that could happen on a separate PR> Also, ldapdomain requires translation
image

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland added this to the 4.23 milestone Dec 8, 2025
@apache apache deleted a comment from blueorangutan Dec 8, 2025
@apache apache deleted a comment from blueorangutan Dec 8, 2025
@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 15950

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor Author

@blueorangutan test

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests

@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-14926)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), zone: Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 52399 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr11962-t14926-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 144 look OK, 6 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File
test_01_secure_vm_migration Error 133.98 test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_secure_vm_migration Error 133.99 test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm Error 14.84 test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_migrate_vm_strict_tags_success Error 76.11 test_vm_strict_host_tags.py
test_01_verify_ipv6_vpc Error 53.15 test_vpc_ipv6.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL Error 106.98 test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes Error 63.03 test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers Error 56.28 test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics Error 103.70 test_vpc_redundant.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers Error 108.75 test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn Failure 56.35 test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn_multiple_options Failure 100.33 test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn Failure 100.33 test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_cancel_host_maintenance_ssh_enabled_agent_connected Failure 1.15 test_host_maintenance.py
test_03_cancel_host_maintenance_ssh_disabled_agent_connected Failure 1.13 test_host_maintenance.py
test_04_cancel_host_maintenance_ssh_disabled_agent_disconnected Failure 0.14 test_host_maintenance.py

@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-14955)

Copy link
Contributor

@sureshanaparti sureshanaparti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clgtm

@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-14994)
Environment: kvm-ol9 (x2), zone: Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol9
Total time taken: 62170 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr11962-t14994-kvm-ol9.zip
Smoke tests completed. 146 look OK, 4 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File
ContextSuite context=TestClusterDRS>:setup Error 0.00 test_cluster_drs.py
test_list_system_vms_metrics_history Failure 0.19 test_metrics_api.py
test_01_deployVMInSharedNetwork Failure 265.67 test_network.py
ContextSuite context=TestResetVmOnReboot>:setup Error 0.00 test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor Author

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 16053

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor Author

@blueorangutan test

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests

@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-14999)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), zone: Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 53542 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr11962-t14999-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 149 look OK, 1 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File
test_03_deploy_and_scale_kubernetes_cluster Failure 26.87 test_kubernetes_clusters.py

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland merged commit 124fcde into apache:main Dec 17, 2025
42 of 45 checks passed
@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland deleted the ghi3685-unlinkLdap branch December 17, 2025 12:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Api/UI: Update API docs or remove the name or ldapdomain parameter no way to unlink account/domain from ldap

8 participants