Skip to content

Conversation

@yx-Yaoxaing
Copy link

What is the purpose of the change

Originally, when annotating a class with @configuration, it couldn't be resolved as a RocketMQ consumer listener class. I changed the way annotations are parsed, allowing classes marked with @configuration to be correctly identified as RocketMQ consumer listener classes. This is because, in our practice at the company, many people also prefer using @configuration.

Brief changelog

In the postProcessAfterInitialization() method of the RocketMQMessageListenerBeanPostProcessor message listener post-processor, I changed the annotation processing approach to:
RocketMQMessageListener ann = (RocketMQMessageListener) AnnotationUtils.findAnnotation(targetClass, RocketMQMessageListener.class);
This modification allows both @configuration and @service annotated classes to function as consumer listeners.

Verifying this change

In production and actively deployed.
RocketMQMessageListener ann = AnnotationUtils.findAnnotation(targetClass, RocketMQMessageListener.class);

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant