-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
[TIR] Add step attribute to ForNode (Initial codes) #18421
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[TIR] Add step attribute to ForNode (Initial codes) #18421
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @wrongtest-intellif, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This PR introduces a step attribute to ForNode, which is a significant and welcome enhancement to TIR. The changes are extensive, touching many parts of the codebase from IR definition, parsers, to various codegen backends and transformation passes. The use of For::ForSimple and CopyOnWrite patterns to manage the new field is well-executed and helps maintain backward compatibility and code clarity. The addition of tests for parsing and round-tripping is also appreciated.
I've found a few issues, mainly related to inconsistencies in codegen backends and a potential bug in the SPIR-V codegen. Addressing these will make this foundational PR more robust.
|
cc @LeiWang1999 |
efe1a4e to
fd57ac5
Compare
|
@wrongtest-intellif @Hzfengsy would be great to check some of the gemini reviews, some seems to be valid |
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a step attribute to ForNode in TIR, which is a significant and welcome enhancement. The changes are extensive, touching many parts of the codebase from the IR definition to codegen and TVMScript. The addition of the CanonicalizeLoop pass is a good approach to maintain compatibility with existing passes. Overall, the implementation is well-structured. However, I've found a critical issue in the loop canonicalization logic and a bug in one of the new tests. Please see my detailed comments below.
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This is a large but well-executed pull request that adds a step attribute to ForNode. The changes are systematic and cover C++, Python, IR nodes, builders, parsers, printers, and codegen backends. The addition of the CanonicalizeLoop pass is a good strategy to maintain backward compatibility with existing passes. The new tests are comprehensive and cover the new functionality well. I have one minor suggestion to improve error handling for the range syntax sugar.
gemini review issues resolved cc @tqchen |
|
Thanks @wrongtest-intellif ! |
An initial change to add
ForNode::step.Add
Optional<PrimExpr>typed step attribute to ForNode. Then add minimal codes forForNode::stepis not dropped by mutations onForNode.TODOs in the future (hopefully)