Skip to content

Conversation

@jelly
Copy link
Member

@jelly jelly commented Dec 2, 2025

No description provided.

@jelly jelly force-pushed the bump-buddy-integration branch from cd4f5e3 to 10577b6 Compare January 8, 2026 16:57
@jelly jelly force-pushed the bump-buddy-integration branch from 10577b6 to d060bd0 Compare January 8, 2026 17:00
@jelly jelly marked this pull request as ready for review January 8, 2026 17:02
Copy link
Member

@anthraxx anthraxx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall awesome change, I haven't yet tested it locally, but except the small proposed changes this looks like it should work <3

@Antiz96
Copy link
Member

Antiz96 commented Jan 8, 2026

Thanks for putting the work into this 🤗

@jelly
Copy link
Member Author

jelly commented Jan 9, 2026

Overall awesome change, I haven't yet tested it locally, but except the small proposed changes this looks like it should work <3

'local_version': 100,
'upstream_version': 100,
'out_of_date': False,
'issue': 12
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

some json elements to not carry any issue property, so I'd suggest just to add a second test testing how process_package or the web code reacts to the missing issue property.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The tests are really wip, they need to be extended more :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants