Skip to content

Conversation

@bharath-123
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

karalabe and others added 30 commits April 25, 2024 11:50
* build: build all the builders to build all the builders

* build: tweak the indexes a bit to make them consistent
* build: drop trusty from PPA builds, EOL and incompatible

* build: add Ubuntu Noble PPA build target
Define these on a value receiever so that nil is shown differently.
Co-authored-by: Sina Mahmoodi <itz.s1na@gmail.com>
* all: refactor so NewBlock(..) and WithBody(..) take a types.Body

* core: fixup comments, remove txs != receipts panic

* core/types: add empty withdrawls to body if len == 0
This PR removes pre-merge sync logic from the downloader. Now-irrelevant tests are removed and others have been updated.
* fix: open file used up but not closed

* feat: more same case

* feat: accept conversation
* core/rawdb, trie: improve db APIs for accessing trie nodes

* triedb/pathdb: fix
* core/state, internal/workerpool: parallelize parts of state commit

* core, internal: move workerpool into syncx

* core/state: use errgroups, commit accounts concurrently

* core: resurrect detailed commit timers to almost-accuracy
* preallocated capacity for map's certain usege of memory

* preallocated capacity for map's certain usege of memory
…BlockRoot` (#29355)

Added a start/end system where tracer can be notified that processing of some Ethereum system calls is starting processing and also notifies it when the processing has completed.

Doing a start/end for system call will enable tracers to "route" incoming next tracing events to go to a separate bucket than other EVM calls. Those not interested by this fact can simply avoid registering the hooks.

The EVM call is going to be traced normally afterward between the signals provided by those 2 new hooks but outside of a transaction context OnTxStart/End. That something implementors of live tracers will need to be aware of (since only "trx tracers" are not concerned by ProcessBeaconRoot).

---------

Co-authored-by: Sina Mahmoodi <itz.s1na@gmail.com>
ethdb/pebble: use GetOrRegister instead of NewRegistered when creating metrics
dknopik and others added 30 commits July 31, 2024 21:38
…(#30239)

## Issue

If `nextTime` has passed, but all nodes are excluded, `get` would return
`nil` and `run` would therefore not invoke `schedule`. Then, we schedule
a timer for the past, as neither `nextTime` value has been updated. This
creates a busy loop, as the timer immediately returns.

## Fix

With this PR, revalidation will be also rescheduled when all nodes are
excluded.

---------

Co-authored-by: lightclient <lightclient@protonmail.com>
This PR fixes an issue in the setMode method of beaconBackfiller where the
log message was not displaying the previous mode correctly. The log message
now shows both the old and new sync modes.
The package `github.com/golang/protobuf/proto` is deprecated in favor
`google.golang.org/protobuf/proto`. We should update the codes to
recommended package.

Signed-off-by: Icarus Wu <icaruswu66@qq.com>
Adding the correct accessList parameter when calling a contract can
reduce gas consumption. However, the current version only allows adding
the accessList manually when constructing the transaction. This PR can
provide convenience for saving gas.
Removing because memsize will very likely be broken by Go 1.23. See
fjl/memsize#4
Fixes #30254 

It seems like the removed CreateAccount call is very old and not needed anymore.
After removing it, setting a sender that does not exist in the state doesn't seem to cause
an issue.
…sed (#30267)

Seems it is checked with the wrong argument

Signed-off-by: jsvisa <delweng@gmail.com>
The struct-based tracing added in #29189 seems to have caused an issue
with the benchmark `BenchmarkTracerStepVsCallFrame`. On master we see
the following panic:

```console
BenchmarkTracerStepVsCallFrame
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x2 addr=0x40 pc=0x1019782f0]

goroutine 37 [running]:
github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/eth/tracers/js.(*jsTracer).OnOpcode(0x140004c4000, 0x0, 0x10?, 0x989680, 0x1, {0x101ea2298, 0x1400000e258}, {0x1400000e258?, 0x14000155928?, 0x10173020c?}, ...)
        /Users/matt/dev/go-ethereum/eth/tracers/js/goja.go:328 +0x140
github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/core/vm.(*EVMInterpreter).Run(0x14000307da0, 0x140003cc0d0, {0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, 0x0)
 ...
FAIL    github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/core/vm/runtime 0.420s
FAIL
```

The issue seems to be that `OnOpcode` expects that `OnTxStart` has
already been called to initialize the `env` value in the tracer. The JS
tracer uses it in `OnOpcode` for the `GetRefund()` method.

This patch resolves the issue by reusing the `Call` method already
defined in `runtime_test.go` which correctly calls `OnTxStart`.
Some chains’ network IDs use hexadecimal such as Optimism ("0xa" instead
of "10"), so when converting the string to big.Int, we cannot specify
base 10; otherwise, it will encounter errors with hexadecimal network
IDs.
This PR adds the methods `Stack.swap1..16()` that faster than `Stack.swap(1..16)`. 

Co-authored-by: lmittmann <lmittmann@users.noreply.github.com>
…0274) (#30277)

Precomputes valid primitive types into a map to use for validation, thus removing sprintf.
Consistently use `uint64` for indices in `Memory` and drop lots of type
conversions from `uint64` to `int64`.

---------

Co-authored-by: lmittmann <lmittmann@users.noreply.github.com>
Due to https://github.com/ethereum/tests/releases/tag/v10.1, the format
of the TransactionTest changed, but it was not properly addressed, causing the test
to pass unexpectedly.

---------

Co-authored-by: Martin Holst Swende <martin@swende.se>
…nloader queue (#30276)

Fixes a slight miscalculation in the downloader queue, which was not accurately taking block withdrawals into account when calculating the size of the items in the queue
fixes #30279 -- previously we did not use the basefee from the genesis, and instead the defaults were used from `runtime.go/setDefaults`-function
…ead of hard-coded value (#29721)


Co-authored-by: Felix Lange <fjl@twurst.com>
Co-authored-by: Marius van der Wijden <m.vanderwijden@live.de>
Co-authored-by: lightclient <lightclient@protonmail.com>
Looking at the history of these packages over the past several years, there
haven't been any meaningful contributions or usages:
https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/commits/master/p2p/simulations?before=de6d5976794a9ed3b626d4eba57bf7f0806fb970+35

Almost all of the commits are part of larger refactors or low-hanging-fruit contributions.
Seems like it's not providing much value and taking up team + contributor time.
…lete storage (#30258)

This pull request fixes #30229.
 
During snap sync, large storage will be split into several pieces and
synchronized concurrently. Unfortunately, the tradeoff is that the respective
merkle trie of each storage chunk will be incomplete due to the incomplete
boundaries. The trie nodes on these boundaries will be discarded, and any
dangling nodes on disk will also be removed if they fall on these paths,
ensuring the state healer won't be blocked.

However, the dangling account trie nodes on the path from the root to the
associated account are left untouched. This means the dangling account trie
nodes could potentially stop the state healing and break the assumption that the
entire subtrie should exist if the subtrie root exists. We should consider the
account trie node as the ancestor of the corresponding storage trie node.

In the scenarios described in the above ticket, the state corruption could occur
if there is a dangling account trie node while some storage trie nodes are
removed due to synchronization redo.

The fixing idea is pretty straightforward, the trie nodes on the path from root
to account should all be explicitly removed if an incomplete storage trie
occurs. Therefore, a `delete` operation has been added into `gentrie` to
explicitly clear the account along with all nodes on this path. The special
thing is that it's a cross-trie clearing. In theory, there may be a dangling
node at any position on this account key and we have to clear all of them.
…:astriaorg/flame into bharath/upgrade-to-1.14.4
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.