Net::HTTP.SOCKSProxy auth support, take 2#33
Conversation
|
Hi, I'd like to see this in a socksify release so I can use it in Faraday. I don't personally use a SOCKS proxy, but I have successfully tested it in my integration suite with Faraday and a golang socks server. Is there any way I can help get this out? /cc Integration test suite PR: technoweenie/faraday-live#7 |
|
is this good to go? |
|
Same question as @guivinicius : what is preventing this PR from being merged for so long ? |
|
Is there anything we can do to move this forward? |
|
Is that dead? |
|
Who wants to become maintainer? |
|
@astro if you are still looking for a maintainer for socksify I'm happy to give it a go. |
|
@MatzFan Thanks. Please be kind to my baby. ;-) |
|
With 40M downloads from rubygems.org I could hardly do otherwise :-) |
|
Oh, I was not aware. In that case I would like to read all changes before publishing to rubygems.org. Please ping me whenever you tag a release. |
|
@astro sure, will do. |
|
Can this be merged? Works well. |
|
Looks like a solid solution. Do you have any blockers to release this? |
dae6100 to
2fd0fc3
Compare
2fd0fc3 to
4af5542
Compare
|
I eventually rebased this one but the linter isn't happy and there are no tests for the new functionality. Before I merge I'd love to get some review and suggestions by you who are more versed with contemporary Ruby practices. |
|
The lack of a test facility for socks authentication was my only objection to adding this functionality, but someone further down that thread said it can be done with SSH. I'll take a look, this is long overdue. |
This MR is inspired by #24, but does not use thread-local variables to store username/password. This is IMO safest and cleanest way to do it.