Conversation
|
Doing a fly-by pass on this PR...is this still relevant? |
|
This is absolutely something we need to do, except it may be even more involved now, because of all the changes upstream. |
|
@Vagabond Time for some belated repo curating ... is there any plan to fix this for Riak 2.0? |
|
I know you're busy, Andrew, but ... re-ping? |
|
Setting milestone to 2.1 since it's something we absolutely need to do but too late for 2.0. |
|
leaving at milestone |
|
@seancribbs is this change still necessary? If so, what do we do about our branch of poolboy? Update ours to latest? |
|
Run the quickcheck tests again, make sure things are still good and update, yeah. IIRC, some of the poolboy changes caused a minor problem with the EQC tests around worker exits, but I think it was a cosmetic problem, not a property violation. Make sure you run a lot of iterations of the tests. |
|
FYI - this PR is superseded by #639. |
Worker arguments are passed as a separate list, now.