Open
Conversation
This is more elegant and convenient than having to call get_members and manually filter it yourself.
Contributor
|
Looks good, manual testing showed output as expected. |
Contributor
|
+1 43da85d |
borshop
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 30, 2016
Add get_local_members API call Reviewed-by: bsparrow435
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Having a dedicated API function is more elegant and convenient than having to call
get_membersand manually filter it yourself.Adding this function will help address one of Torben's review comments on the LES code.