Skip to content

Optimization: Replace np.apply_along_axis(np.sum, 1, ...) with direct sum(axis=1) for better performance #126

@SaFE-APIOpt

Description

@SaFE-APIOpt

ref_count = np.apply_along_axis(np.sum, 1, haps == 0)

Suggested Code Replacement
Current implementation:

nonref_count = np.apply_along_axis(np.sum, 1, haps == 1)
ref_count = np.apply_along_axis(np.sum, 1, haps == 0)

Recommended replacement:

nonref_count = (haps == 1).sum(axis=1)
ref_count = (haps == 0).sum(axis=1)

The use of np.apply_along_axis here is unnecessary and introduces significant performance overhead. Internally, apply_along_axis works by slicing the array row by row and applying a Python function (np.sum) to each slice, which is implemented as a Python-level loop. This results in slower execution and additional memory handling, especially on large arrays.

In contrast, the direct use of sum(axis=1) is a vectorized operation fully implemented in C under NumPy's core. It avoids Python overhead, works directly on contiguous memory blocks, and executes substantially faster. In benchmark tests, replacing apply_along_axis(np.sum, 1, ...) with .sum(axis=1) results in 10–100× speed improvements depending on array size.

The two implementations are functionally equivalent in this context, so the optimized version is a safe drop-in replacement that improves both performance and readability.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions