[enhance] Workflow Saving Update Existing md Files

camel/agents/chat_agent.py

@@ -1781,8 +1781,18 @@ def summarize(
             # convert structured output to custom markdown if present
             if structured_output:
                 # convert structured output to custom markdown
+                # exclude operation_mode and target_workflow_filename
+                # if present (used for workflow save logic, not persisted)
+                exclude_fields = []
+                if hasattr(structured_output, 'operation_mode'):
+                    exclude_fields.append('operation_mode')
+                if hasattr(structured_output, 'target_workflow_filename'):
+                    exclude_fields.append('target_workflow_filename')
+
                 summary_content = context_util.structured_output_to_markdown(
-                    structured_data=structured_output, metadata=metadata
+                    structured_data=structured_output,
+                    metadata=metadata,
+                    exclude_fields=exclude_fields if exclude_fields else None,
                 )
             if add_user_messages:
                 summary_content = self._append_user_messages_section(
@@ -2215,8 +2225,18 @@ async def asummarize(
             # convert structured output to custom markdown if present
             if structured_output:
                 # convert structured output to custom markdown
+                # exclude operation_mode and target_workflow_filename
+                # if present (used for workflow save logic, not persisted)
+                exclude_fields = []
+                if hasattr(structured_output, 'operation_mode'):
+                    exclude_fields.append('operation_mode')
+                if hasattr(structured_output, 'target_workflow_filename'):
+                    exclude_fields.append('target_workflow_filename')
+
                 summary_content = context_util.structured_output_to_markdown(
-                    structured_data=structured_output, metadata=metadata
+                    structured_data=structured_output,
+                    metadata=metadata,
+                    exclude_fields=exclude_fields if exclude_fields else None,
                 )
             if add_user_messages:
                 summary_content = self._append_user_messages_section(

camel/benchmarks/browsecomp.py

@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ class QueryResponse(BaseModel):
     )
     exact_answer: str = Field(description="""your succinct, final answer.""")
     confidence: str = Field(
-        description="""
+        description=r"""
 your confidence score between 0|\%| and 100|\%| for your answer.
 """
     )
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ class GradingResponse(BaseModel):
 incorrect."""
     )
     confidence: str = Field(
-        description="""The extracted confidence score between 0|\%| 
+        description=r"""The extracted confidence score between 0|\%|
 and 100|\%| from [response]. Put 100 if there is no confidence score available.
 """
     )
@@ -160,8 +160,8 @@ class EvalResult(BaseModel):
 {content}
 """
 
-GRADER_TEMPLATE = """
-Judge whether the following [response] to [question] is correct or not 
+GRADER_TEMPLATE = r"""
+Judge whether the following [response] to [question] is correct or not
 based on the precise and unambiguous [correct_answer] below.
 
 [question]: {question}
@@ -171,26 +171,26 @@ class EvalResult(BaseModel):
 Your judgement must be in the format and criteria specified below:
 
 extracted_final_answer: The final exact answer extracted from the [response].
-Put the extracted answer as 'None' if there is no exact, final answer to 
+Put the extracted answer as 'None' if there is no exact, final answer to
 extract from the response.
 
 [correct_answer]: {correct_answer}
 
-reasoning: Explain why the extracted_final_answer is correct or incorrect 
-based on [correct_answer], focusing only on if there are meaningful 
-differences between [correct_answer] and the extracted_final_answer. 
-Do not comment on any background to the problem, do not attempt 
-to solve the problem, do not argue for any answer different 
+reasoning: Explain why the extracted_final_answer is correct or incorrect
+based on [correct_answer], focusing only on if there are meaningful
+differences between [correct_answer] and the extracted_final_answer.
+Do not comment on any background to the problem, do not attempt
+to solve the problem, do not argue for any answer different
 than [correct_answer], focus only on whether the answers match.
 
-correct: Answer 'yes' if extracted_final_answer matches the 
-[correct_answer] given above, or is within a small margin of error for 
-numerical problems. Answer 'no' otherwise, i.e. if there is any 
-inconsistency, ambiguity, non-equivalency, or if the extracted answer is 
+correct: Answer 'yes' if extracted_final_answer matches the
+[correct_answer] given above, or is within a small margin of error for
+numerical problems. Answer 'no' otherwise, i.e. if there is any
+inconsistency, ambiguity, non-equivalency, or if the extracted answer is
 incorrect.
 
 
-confidence: The extracted confidence score between 0|\%| and 100|\%| 
+confidence: The extracted confidence score between 0|\%| and 100|\%|
 from [response]. Put 100 if there is no confidence score available.
 """.strip()