Skip to content

Conversation

@rach-id
Copy link
Member

@rach-id rach-id commented Nov 18, 2025

Overview

Closes #2258

@rach-id rach-id requested a review from jcstein November 18, 2025 14:53
@rach-id rach-id self-assigned this Nov 18, 2025
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @rach-id, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the nodes-overview.md documentation to provide essential hardware guidance for validators. It specifically addresses the CPU requirements for nodes upgrading to the 128mb/6s configuration, ensuring operators have the necessary information to select appropriate hardware for optimal network performance and stability.

Highlights

  • Validator Hardware Requirements: Added specific CPU hardware requirements for validators when upgrading to the 128mb/6s configuration.
  • CPU Benchmark and Recommendations: Included links to the CPU benchmark tool and release notes for tested CPUs, along with recommended specifications such as 32+ cores, GFNI, and SHA-NI support.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

PR Preview Action v1.6.2

🚀 View preview at
https://celestiaorg.github.io/docs-preview/pr-2311/

Built to branch main at 2025-11-18 14:54 UTC.
Preview will be ready when the GitHub Pages deployment is complete.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds important information about hardware requirements for validators when upgrading to 128mb/6s. The changes are clear and provide useful links to a CPU benchmark and release notes. I've added one suggestion to improve the structure and clarity of the new section to avoid potential confusion with the existing hardware requirements table. Overall, a good addition to the documentation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Change the validator hardware requirements and add CPU features

2 participants