Skip to content

Conversation

@nikhil2611
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This pull request introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow stub for CI checks on the main branch and adds a SonarQube configuration file for Ruby projects. These changes help standardize CI processes and enable automated code quality analysis.

Continuous Integration Workflow:

  • Added .github/workflows/ci-main-pull-request-stub.yml as a reusable stub to invoke a centralized GitHub Actions workflow for CI checks on pull requests and pushes to main, develop, and release/** branches. This includes settings for security scans, SAST/SCA, SBOM generation, and more, with extensive configuration options and secret management.

Code Quality and Analysis:

  • Updated sonar-project.properties to configure SonarQube for Ruby projects, specifying project metadata, source and test directories, language settings, and exclusion rules, facilitating automated static analysis and code quality reporting.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Chore (non-breaking change that does not add functionality or fix an issue)

Checklist:

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have run the pre-merge tests locally and they pass.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • If Gemfile.lock has changed, I have used --conservative to do it and included the full output in the Description above.
  • All new and existing tests passed.
  • All commits have been signed-off for the Developer Certificate of Origin.

Signed-off-by: nikhil2611 <nikhilgupta2102@gmail.com>
@sonarqube-for-infrastructure-prod

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants