Skip to content

Conversation

@ajay-dhangar
Copy link
Member

Potential fix for https://github.com/codeharborhub/blog/security/code-scanning/3

In general, the fix is to add an explicit permissions block to the workflow (or to this job) that grants only the scopes required. This workflow reads and writes issues via the GitHub API, so it needs issues: write. It does not need write access to repository contents, so we can set contents: read (or omit it entirely; keeping it explicit improves clarity).

The best minimal change is to add a permissions block at the top level, just after the on: block (affecting all jobs). Concretely, edit .github/workflows/close-old-issue.yml to insert:

permissions:
  contents: read
  issues: write

between the existing on: block (lines 2–4) and the jobs: block (line 6). No imports or additional methods are needed; this is purely a YAML configuration change within the workflow.

Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.

…n permissions

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@ajay-dhangar ajay-dhangar marked this pull request as ready for review January 19, 2026 14:44
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great job, @ajay-dhangar! 🎉 Thank you for submitting your pull request to CodeHarborHub. We appreciate your contribution and enthusiasm! Our team will review it soon. If you have any questions or need further assistance, feel free to reach out. Thanks for contributing!

@github-actions
Copy link

⚡️ Lighthouse Report for the Deploy Preview of this PR 🚀

🔗 Site: CodeHarborHub | Live Site

URL 🌐 Performance Accessibility Best Practices SEO 📊
/blog/ 🔴 36 🟢 92 🟢 96 🟢 100 📄
/blog/authors/ 🟡 71 🟢 90 🟢 96 🟡 86 📄
/blog/tags/ 🟡 55 🟢 90 🟢 96 🟡 86 📄

@ajay-dhangar ajay-dhangar merged commit a4e902b into main Jan 19, 2026
9 of 10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants