Skip to content

Conversation

@maxime-desroches
Copy link
Contributor

@maxime-desroches maxime-desroches commented Feb 12, 2025

Also reduce memory required from 90GB -> 1.8GB

@andiradulescu
Copy link
Collaborator

andiradulescu commented Feb 12, 2025

do we need to build userdata in GitHub CI? although it doesn't sound quite right, could we skip the userdata images in scripts/package_ota.py, if they don't exist, instead?

@maxime-desroches
Copy link
Contributor Author

Running locally should always be the same as running CI. The only difference that is ok is the infrastructure that actually runs the test/build.

This reverts commit a85524f.
@andiradulescu
Copy link
Collaborator

Totally understand. Just that producing artifacts of 5.28 GB is huge. Plus they get uploaded to GitLab LFS when using [upload].

@andiradulescu
Copy link
Collaborator

andiradulescu commented Feb 27, 2025

can you merge this? I will try to come up with something after.

current sizes:

660M    userdata_30.img
661M    userdata_89.img
660M    userdata_90.img

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants