Skip to content

Conversation

@lgarron
Copy link

@lgarron lgarron commented Nov 19, 2025

"May not" has opposite colloquial and formal interpretations, which is why a lot of documents follow https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt and use "must not" to avoid any ambiguity.

This PR updates all occurrences of "may not" to "must not", as they all seem to indicate an absolute prohibition.

Addresses: #812

@lgarron lgarron changed the title Update occurrences of "may not" to "must not". Update occurrences of "may not" to "must not" (matching RFC2119) Nov 19, 2025
@lgarron lgarron changed the title Update occurrences of "may not" to "must not" (matching RFC2119) Update occurrences of "may not" to "must not" (matching RFC 2119) Nov 19, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant