Skip to content

inp will evaluate truthy or falsey without the need for bool() #13

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
sametz wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

inp will evaluate truthy or falsey without the need for bool() #13

sametz wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@sametz
Copy link

@sametz sametz commented Mar 7, 2023

…although bool(inp) makes the intent more clear.

@sametz
inp will evaluate truthy or falsey without the need for bool(), a…
33d9915 
…lthough `bool(inp)` makes the intent more clear.
@dabeaz
Copy link
Owner

dabeaz commented Mar 7, 2023

I'd like to keep the bool() to make it consistent with all of the other functions such as filt().

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@sametz @dabeaz