Skip to content

chore: remove CODEOWNERS file#661

Merged
lklimek merged 1 commit intodashpay:v1.0-devfrom
thepastaclaw:remove-codeowners
Feb 25, 2026
Merged

chore: remove CODEOWNERS file#661
lklimek merged 1 commit intodashpay:v1.0-devfrom
thepastaclaw:remove-codeowners

Conversation

@thepastaclaw
Copy link
Collaborator

@thepastaclaw thepastaclaw commented Feb 25, 2026

Remove the CODEOWNERS file as it is no longer needed.

Validation

  • CI passes (no code changes; file removal only)
  • CODEOWNERS removal is intentional — the file is no longer needed per the PR description
  • No alternate code ownership policy exists to replace it

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated repository configuration settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 25, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3c7fb0b and 9b11167.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/CODEOWNERS
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • .github/CODEOWNERS

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request removes two lines from the .github/CODEOWNERS configuration file: a header comment and the default code owner mapping that previously assigned all files to two owners.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
CODEOWNERS Configuration
.github/CODEOWNERS
Removed header comment and default owner mapping (2 lines deleted).

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 Two lines hop away into the void,
CODEOWNERS simplified, no owners deployed,
The defaults now gone, the slate clean and bare,
A lighter config floats through the air! 🌟

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: removing CODEOWNERS entries, which aligns with the PR objective and file modifications shown in the summary.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@lklimek lklimek merged commit 9d60137 into dashpay:v1.0-dev Feb 25, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants