Fix condition in zeros() to properly check for non-empty arrays for NumPy 2.x compatibility#110
Fix condition in zeros() to properly check for non-empty arrays for NumPy 2.x compatibility#110
Conversation
…umPy 2.x compatibility dask#109
|
Hi @milesgranger, could you please review this PR? |
|
Hi @xlt208, PR itself looks good - CI is unhappy w/ some outdated action:
I assume it's okay to merge and fix that in a follow-up, but I'll defer to the wisdom of @fjetter since I'm not so active here any longer. :) |
|
@milesgranger - Thank you! |
|
Hi all, apologies for resurrecting this but I'm wondering if there's any chance that this could get merged (and maybe a release put out with the result)? It's a blocker for anyone trying to update to |
|
Sorry for the lack of engagement here. I'll take a look at this. |
|
Sorry for the very long delay. This has been merged into main. |
|
@mrocklin - Thanks for much for working on this! Did you know when a new release would be available with this fix included? |
dask_glm.utils.zeroswith NumPy 2.x due to ambiguous truth value of empty array #109@ravinara001 @iirsdeeps @Nithyapriyabnp @rwmajor2 @RanjanRohit