fix: Update NodeJs Query goldens for autopush (Nov 2025 data)

[SandeepTuniki]

Our automated tests have been failing because new data for Nov 2025 was recently added to the system, while the tests were still expecting the older results from September, so they flagged the difference as an error.

This PR updates the golden files to include this new Nov 2025 data.

Commands Ran (for future reference)

cd tools/nl/nodejs_query_differ

# Update the local golden files with the latest results from GCS
uv run differ.py -m update

# (Optional) Verify that the local goldens now match the latest test run
uv run differ.py -m diff -e autopush

Verification

• Ran ./tools/nl/nodejs_query_differ/run.sh -m diff -e autopush locally.
• Verified that all tests (bar, timeline, scatter, etc.) now return "Success".

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @SandeepTuniki, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request resolves automated test failures by updating the Node.js Query golden files to reflect the latest November 2025 data. Previously, tests were failing because they were still validating against older September data. The changes ensure that the test suite accurately reflects current system data, allowing all related tests to pass successfully.

Highlights

• Golden File Update: The pull request updates Node.js Query golden files for autopush tests.
• Data Synchronization: New November 2025 data was introduced, causing previous tests to fail due to expecting older September results. This PR resolves that by incorporating the new data.
• bar.json Modifications: The bar.json golden file was specifically updated to include the November 2025 data points in its dataCsv field, adjust the highlight date and value, and update the chart title to reflect the new month.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request updates the golden files for Node.js query tests to account for new data from November 2025, which was causing test failures. The changes in bar.json correctly add the new data points, update the highlighted values, and adjust the chart titles accordingly. The modifications are consistent and directly address the issue described. The changes look good to me.

[SandeepTuniki]

Looks like vish-cs@ fixed this yesterday already lol - #5908

I'm closing my PR.