Skip to content

Conversation

@SQLDBAWithABeard
Copy link
Collaborator

A New PR

THANK YOU - We love to get PR's and really appreciate your time and help to improve this module

Accepting a PR

Before we accept the PR - please confirm that you have run the tests locally to avoid our automated build and release process failing. You can see how to do that in our wiki

https://github.com/sqlcollaborative/dbachecks/wiki

Please confirm you have 0 failing Pester Tests

[X] There are 0 failing Pester tests

Changes this PR brings

Whilst running HADR checks I realised that the dbatools commands that we use return different property names now which makes for false negatives

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Linux Test Results

    1 files    556 suites   25s ⏱️
1 940 tests 1 940 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
2 318 runs  2 318 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit d114dac.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

WinPS51 Test Results

    1 files    556 suites   20s ⏱️
1 940 tests 1 940 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
2 318 runs  2 318 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit d114dac.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

WinPS71 Test Results

    1 files    556 suites   23s ⏱️
1 940 tests 1 940 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
2 318 runs  2 318 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit d114dac.

@SQLDBAWithABeard SQLDBAWithABeard merged commit 948f90f into main Mar 24, 2025
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants