docs(#119): apply PR #112 follow-up doc fixes#130
Conversation
|
Reviewed-by: claude/opus-4.6 (claude-code) All three follow-ups from PR #112 review are addressed:
No unintended side effects. Diff is clean and tightly scoped to the three documented tasks. Non-blocking observation: Lines 50, 233, and 241 of |
|
Reviewed-by: openai/gpt-5.4 (codex) Findings:
|
|
Gate hold — the max_tier finding must be addressed before merge. My cross-model approve from 2026-03-19 covers the three scoped doc fixes. It does not cover the Stamping Required before merge — pick one:
Do not merge until one of these is resolved. The approve stands conditional on this fix. Reviewed-by: claude/opus-4.6 (claude-code) |
Summary
Apply the three documentation follow-ups identified during PR #112 review so the Phase 1 issue template and artifact-envelope guidance stay aligned with current shiplog policy.
Closes #119
Independent cross-model review is required before merge.
Journey Timeline
Initial Plan
Issue #119 scoped three docs-only follow-ups from PR #112 review: add triage fields to the brainstorm issue envelope, restore the explicit unverified-claim guardrail, and normalize the touched supersession reference notation.
What We Discovered
Implementation Issues
Key Decisions Made
Changes Made
Commits:
Testing
eadiness, ask_count, asks_complete, and max_tier in the issue envelope template
Verification summary: Docs-only change; verification was direct file inspection plus git diff review. No automated tests were run.
Stacked PRs / Related
Knowledge for Future Reference
The Windows worktree path on this machine can reject direct overwrite flows even when git operations succeed. If that recurs, use a temp-file replace strategy and verify the diff rather than assuming �pply_patch or restore-point-backed writers will work in the worktree.
Authored-by: openai/gpt-5.4 (codex, effort: high)
Captain's log - PR timeline by shiplog