Skip to content

add latentpatterns.com to diodb#478

Open
ghuntley wants to merge 2 commits intodisclose:masterfrom
ghuntley:master
Open

add latentpatterns.com to diodb#478
ghuntley wants to merge 2 commits intodisclose:masterfrom
ghuntley:master

Conversation

@ghuntley
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

add latentpatterns.com to diodb

Quality Assurance Checklist

Review Items Y/N
Site has a publicly known bug bounty or vulnerability disclosure program y
Disclosure policy is publicly available y
Public URL y
Submission follows the Diodb schema y

Your Twitter handle (Optional): https://x.com/latentpatterns

cursoragent and others added 2 commits February 21, 2026 12:47
Co-authored-by: Geoffrey Huntley <ghuntley@ghuntley.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 21, 2026 12:50
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds a new vulnerability disclosure program entry for latentpatterns.com to the diodb (Disclosure Database). The entry includes comprehensive security program information including bounty details, safe harbor policy, and coordinated disclosure timeline. Additionally, the PR relocates an existing raidboxes.io entry to maintain proper alphabetical ordering in the database.

Changes:

  • Added new program entry for Latent Patterns with complete security disclosure program details
  • Relocated raidboxes.io entry from end of file to correct alphabetical position in the 'R' section

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@yesnet0
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

yesnet0 commented Mar 28, 2026

Hey @ghuntley — this PR has merge conflicts after a recent merge. Could you rebase against main? The data additions look good, happy to merge once conflicts are resolved. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants