Open
Conversation
Version 1.13.1 doesn't build on arm64. There doesn't seem to be a specific reason to stick with that version, so upgrade to a version that does build for developers working on that architecture.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What github issue is this PR for, if any?
Resolves #791
What does this code do, and why?
ffi 1.13.1 doesn't build on arm64.
There doesn't seem to be a specific reason to stick with that version, so upgrade to a version that does build for developers working on that architecture.
How is this code tested?
Ran tests. Cursory check of app still appears functional.
Are any database migrations required by this change?
None
Are there any configuration or environment changes needed?
Updated gem version; not required immediately but nice to pick up at some future deployment