Skip to content

docs: update templates#74

Open
PiotrKorkus wants to merge 1 commit intoeclipse-score:mainfrom
qorix-group:piotrkorkus_update_docs
Open

docs: update templates#74
PiotrKorkus wants to merge 1 commit intoeclipse-score:mainfrom
qorix-group:piotrkorkus_update_docs

Conversation

@PiotrKorkus
Copy link
Contributor

Replace template references with logging in order to have representative header in reference_integration

Notes for Reviewer

Pre-Review Checklist for the PR Author

  • PR title is short, expressive and meaningful
  • Commits are properly organized
  • Relevant issues are linked in the References section
  • Tests are conducted
  • Unit tests are added

Checklist for the PR Reviewer

  • Commits are properly organized and messages are according to the guideline
  • Unit tests have been written for new behavior
  • Public API is documented
  • PR title describes the changes

Post-review Checklist for the PR Author

  • All open points are addressed and tracked via issues

References

Closes #

- replace template references with logging
@github-actions
Copy link

License Check Results

🚀 The license check job ran with the Bazel command:

bazel run --lockfile_mode=error //:license-check

Status: ⚠️ Needs Review

Click to expand output
[License Check Output]
Extracting Bazel installation...
Starting local Bazel server (8.3.0) and connecting to it...
INFO: Invocation ID: e4fe3dff-16ea-4ba3-a660-926f52e94159
Computing main repo mapping: 
WARNING: For repository 'rules_python', the root module requires module version rules_python@1.4.1, but got rules_python@1.8.3 in the resolved dependency graph. Please update the version in your MODULE.bazel or set --check_direct_dependencies=off
WARNING: For repository 'bazel_skylib', the root module requires module version bazel_skylib@1.7.1, but got bazel_skylib@1.8.2 in the resolved dependency graph. Please update the version in your MODULE.bazel or set --check_direct_dependencies=off
WARNING: For repository 'rules_rust', the root module requires module version rules_rust@0.61.0, but got rules_rust@0.67.0 in the resolved dependency graph. Please update the version in your MODULE.bazel or set --check_direct_dependencies=off
WARNING: For repository 'rules_cc', the root module requires module version rules_cc@0.1.1, but got rules_cc@0.2.16 in the resolved dependency graph. Please update the version in your MODULE.bazel or set --check_direct_dependencies=off
WARNING: For repository 'aspect_rules_lint', the root module requires module version aspect_rules_lint@1.0.3, but got aspect_rules_lint@2.0.0 in the resolved dependency graph. Please update the version in your MODULE.bazel or set --check_direct_dependencies=off
WARNING: For repository 'buildifier_prebuilt', the root module requires module version buildifier_prebuilt@7.3.1, but got buildifier_prebuilt@8.2.0.2 in the resolved dependency graph. Please update the version in your MODULE.bazel or set --check_direct_dependencies=off
WARNING: For repository 'score_rust_policies', the root module requires module version score_rust_policies@0.0.3, but got score_rust_policies@0.0.5 in the resolved dependency graph. Please update the version in your MODULE.bazel or set --check_direct_dependencies=off
WARNING: For repository 'googletest', the root module requires module version googletest@1.17.0.bcr.1, but got googletest@1.17.0.bcr.2 in the resolved dependency graph. Please update the version in your MODULE.bazel or set --check_direct_dependencies=off
Computing main repo mapping: 
Loading: 
Loading: 4 packages loaded
WARNING: Target pattern parsing failed.
ERROR: Skipping '//:license-check': no such target '//:license-check': target 'license-check' not declared in package '' defined by /home/runner/work/logging/logging/BUILD
Analyzing: 0 targets (5 packages loaded)
ERROR: no such target '//:license-check': target 'license-check' not declared in package '' defined by /home/runner/work/logging/logging/BUILD
INFO: Elapsed time: 5.105s
INFO: 0 processes.
ERROR: Build did NOT complete successfully
ERROR: Build failed. Not running target

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant