Introduce UserDefinedObject
#5514
Open
+60
−30
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
flobernd
force-pushed
the
user-defined-object
branch
4 times, most recently
from
063d015 to
705ebd2
Compare
|
Following you can find the validation changes against the target branch for the APIs. No changes detected. You can validate these APIs yourself by using the |
l-trotta
approved these changes
Oct 27, 2025
|
@l-trotta @Anaethelion Would you be fine with backporting this to 8.19 and potentially 9.2? |
|
yep java resolves all aliases so this changes nothing for me |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The specification uses
Dictionary<string, UserDefinedValue>in many places to indicate that the server returns an "arbitrary" JSON object.This PR introduces a new alias type
UserDefinedObjectthat should instead be used for this purpose, because: