-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
Scripts for seperate CR machines #103
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Until this get's merged, the current Content Resolver is going to wipe out the /c10s/ directory each time it finishes. That's not too much of a problem, it should give us several hours to see how things look. |
|
What would the plan be for when/while we branch c11s? There will certainly be some overlap when both c10s and c11s are being tracked in CR (and with them being in a separate instance, and CS providing only one snapshot per day, perhaps they could be allowed to overlap even longer). Would you make yet another instance for c11s, or use a single instance for all active CS versions? If the latter, the a location should be more generic than |
|
I was thinking of having a separate machine for c11s, which would be in the /c11s/ directory. |
|
It looks like it works. Ya!! |
yselkowitz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are you planning on deploying the CS instance fairly soon after merging this? If so, let's merge the ELN changes into refresh.sh and add only the CS script.
A dedicated CS instance should be able to handle multiple versions, particularly given that CS composes are (only) nightly. Do you think we really need separate instances for each version, and how much harder will that make standing up c11s when the time comes?
Yes, I would like to have this running by end of work day today.
I don't think we need separate instances. One machine should be able to do them both. Especially since they don't have to do extras. I'll make a change so that this goes into /cs/ then when c11s comes around, we just need to add it's tag to the labels option. I think standing up a new instance this size would require fedora infra to set it up. For this project, I lucked out because Adam had a second machine he never shut down. |
|
Changes made. |
(Currently c10s) Update refresh.sh to only do eln labels (Currently eln and eln-extras) Update refresh.sh to exclude the /cs/ directory Signed-off-by: Troy Dawson <tdawson@redhat.com>
0d3cb5f to
94e3c72
Compare
Content Resolver runs refresh.sh in a loop.
In order to run c10s on a seperate machine, we need two new versions of refresh.sh.