Merged
Conversation
shanejonas
commented
Aug 20, 2025
shanejonas
force-pushed
the
feat/eth-sendprivatetx
branch
2 times, most recently
from
d132278 to
a12f636
Compare
TymKh
approved these changes
Aug 20, 2025
shanejonas
force-pushed
the
feat/eth-sendprivatetx
branch
from
a12f636 to
583b77d
Compare
shanejonas
force-pushed
the
feat/eth-sendprivatetx
branch
from
583b77d to
357ad9c
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📝 Summary
This adds support for
eth_sendPrivateTransactioninstead of letting it fall through to the provider.⛱ Motivation and Context
Upstream provider is deprecating their support for this method, and adds an extra hop.
📚 References
✅ I have run these commands
make lintmake testgo mod tidy