Build docker images for v1.0.8 #5302
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Rong Gu <gurong@nju.edu.cn>
Summary of ChangesHello @RongGu, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on updating the version identifiers within the Fluid Helm chart configuration. It specifically modifies the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request aims to build Docker images for the v1.0.8 release by updating version strings. I've identified a potential issue with the versioning format used. The current appVersion and image tags include a commit hash, which is typical for development builds but not for final releases. For an official release, these should be clean version numbers (e.g., 1.0.8). I've left specific suggestions on how to correct this in the code. I also noted that the Helm chart version itself was not incremented, which is inconsistent with the project's own documented conventions. Lastly, I'd recommend filling out the PR description in future pull requests for better traceability.
| # This is the version number of the application being deployed. This version number should be | ||
| # incremented each time you make changes to the application. | ||
| appVersion: 1.0.8-29e1c1e | ||
| appVersion: 1.0.8-6533239 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Given the PR title "Build docker images for v1.0.8", this appears to be a release preparation. For a final release, the appVersion should typically be a clean version like 1.0.8 rather than 1.0.8-6533239, which suggests a pre-release build. Using a clean version number is standard practice for releases. Additionally, the chart version on line 17 has not been updated, which goes against the convention described in the comment on lines 15-16.
appVersion: 1.0.8| imagePrefix: &defaultImagePrefix fluidcloudnative | ||
| # imagePrefix: &defaultImagePrefix registry.aliyuncs.com/fluid | ||
| version: &defaultVersion v1.0.8-29e1c1e | ||
| version: &defaultVersion v1.0.8-6533239 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To align with a final v1.0.8 release, this version string should likely be v1.0.8 instead of v1.0.8-6533239. This ensures that the Docker image tags correspond to the official release version.
version: &defaultVersion v1.0.8
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5302 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 56.97% 56.96% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 442 442
Lines 30529 30529
==========================================
- Hits 17393 17390 -3
- Misses 11521 11523 +2
- Partials 1615 1616 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
2 participants
Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does
Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?
fixes #XXXX
Ⅲ. List the added test cases (unit test/integration test) if any, please explain if no tests are needed.
Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it
Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews