Attempt to improve matching performance

[Schamper]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 30 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (eeea00d) to head (aeaaf8b).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
dissect/util/compression/lz4.py	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️
dissect/util/compression/lzfse.py	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️
dissect/util/compression/lzo.py	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️
dissect/util/compression/lzvn.py	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️
dissect/util/compression/lzxpress.py	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️
dissect/util/compression/lzxpress_huffman.py	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main    #105   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   0.00%   0.00%           
=====================================
  Files         27      27           
  Lines       1880    1898   +18     
=====================================
- Misses      1880    1898   +18     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #105 will improve performances by ×28

_{Comparing compression-performance (aeaaf8b) with main (eeea00d)}

Summary

⚡ 8 improvements
✅ 18 untouched
⏩ 10 skipped¹

Benchmarks breakdown

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Change
⚡	test_benchmark_large_lz4_decompress[python]	5,410.6 µs	194.1 µs	×28
⚡	test_benchmark_lz4_decompress[python]	136.7 µs	64.8 µs	×2.1
⚡	test_benchmark_large_lzfse_decompress	11.1 ms	6 ms	+85.7%
⚡	test_benchmark_large_lzo_decompress[python]	2,287 µs	590.9 µs	×3.9
⚡	test_benchmark_lzo_decompress[python]	143.6 µs	98.8 µs	+45.32%
⚡	test_benchmark_large_lzvn_decompress	5.7 ms	1.3 ms	×4.3
⚡	test_benchmark_large_lzxpress_decompress	5,803.8 µs	567.7 µs	×10
⚡	test_benchmark_large_lzxpress_huffman_decompress	11.1 ms	5.9 ms	+88.7%

Footnotes

1. 10 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩