Skip to content

Conversation

@Schamper
Copy link
Member

Closes #104

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 20, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 25 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (f58bb31) to head (3c6f268).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
dissect/util/hash/crc32.py 0.00% 25 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main    #107   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   0.00%   0.00%           
=====================================
  Files         27      28    +1     
  Lines       1881    1906   +25     
=====================================
- Misses      1881    1906   +25     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Oct 20, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #107 will not alter performance

Comparing crc32 (3c6f268) with main (f58bb31)

Summary

✅ 26 untouched
⏩ 10 skipped1

Footnotes

  1. 10 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@Schamper Schamper requested a review from Horofic October 27, 2025 08:17
@Schamper Schamper requested a review from Horofic November 12, 2025 13:10
@Schamper Schamper merged commit 9c3478f into main Nov 12, 2025
33 checks passed
@Schamper Schamper deleted the crc32 branch November 12, 2025 13:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add a crc32 module that accepts a custom polynomial or table

3 participants