patches: add support for Zyxel NWA1121#39
Conversation
Oliver gave me some of these devices. This patch adds support for them.
|
i tried building it on my local build machine. first try i got an error (without verbose so i did not see the error), second try the build process waited for me to answear if he should build an image for this device and i answered with y and it continued: |
|
@Dark4MD Thank you very much. Unfortunately I don't have access to your Google drive. Please use e.g. https://transfer.sh instead. |
|
https://transfer.sh/m9UUy/gluon-ffh-vH0.dev.20190622-zyxel-nwa1121-sysupgrade.bin |
|
Thank you very much. Unfortunately the patch writer did not know about partitioning in OpenWrt. Thus I need to change the layout later. |
|
Codefetch may unblock this, if he changed the layout. |
|
Someone is working on support for this device an even for the ATH79 Target :D Oh, just saw that he is one of us XD Explains a lot |
|
Looks like @s-2 's upstream contribution right now just needs an updated commit message? |
|
@CodeFetch was the request to merge this into master intentional? Shouldn't we start with nightly? |
|
@AiyionPrime No, this is just kept open for reference. |
Is there anything that should be improved regarding the commit messages of #4037? I had tested NWA-1121-NI with gluon months ago, meanwhile the device vanished from the map since I had to flash it back to OpenWrt for testing changes made to the PR. |
|
I hope a merging in OpenWrt... |
|
@s-2 @CodeFetch openwrt/openwrt@251ecfe was merged 16 days ago. Time to rebase this accordingly and reduce it to a gluon-only patch. |
|
@CodeFetch I suppose a 'backport' into this PR would be pretty easy given that 22.03 isn't that far from master yet. But @s-2 and me came to the conclusion that we won't do that for this device. Do you intend to? |
|
Current state of gluon patch is here: https://github.com/s-2/gluon/tree/zyxel_nwa11xx |
|
@s-2: I hope! |
|
This needs a rebase, if this should ever happen. |
Oliver gave me some of these devices.
This patch adds support for them.
@Dark4MD I'd really like to have an image for them. I haven't tested it. Let's see what Jenkins says...