chore(py): add back evaluator sample#4957
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request reintroduces a comprehensive Python sample for Genkit evaluators, providing practical examples of how to implement custom evaluation logic. It showcases two distinct approaches: a simple regex-based evaluator for pattern matching and a more advanced LLM-as-judge evaluator for subjective scoring. The changes aim to guide users in developing their own evaluation functions within the Genkit framework, complete with updated documentation and necessary data files for immediate testing. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces two new evaluators: a regex-based URL matcher and an LLM-as-judge for 'deliciousness'. It includes the necessary datasets and a prompt definition for the LLM evaluator. The README.md has been updated to provide clear instructions on how to run these new evaluators. The implementation is clean, leverages Pydantic for robust schema validation, and correctly utilizes environment variables for model configuration, which are good practices for maintainability and flexibility. The changes enhance the sample evaluators, providing practical examples of both rule-based and LLM-powered evaluation patterns within the Genkit framework.
No description provided.