Skip to content

chore(deps): update rust crate bytes to v1.11.1 [security]#260

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
renovate/crate-bytes-vulnerability
Open

chore(deps): update rust crate bytes to v1.11.1 [security]#260
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
renovate/crate-bytes-vulnerability

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 3, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
bytes dependencies patch 1.11.01.11.1

Integer overflow in BytesMut::reserve

RUSTSEC-2026-0007

More information

Details

In the unique reclaim path of BytesMut::reserve, the condition

if v_capacity >= new_cap + offset

uses an unchecked addition. When new_cap + offset overflows usize in release builds, this condition may incorrectly pass, causing self.cap to be set to a value that exceeds the actual allocated capacity. Subsequent APIs such as spare_capacity_mut() then trust this corrupted cap value and may create out-of-bounds slices, leading to UB.

This behavior is observable in release builds (integer overflow wraps), whereas debug builds panic due to overflow checks.

PoC
use bytes::*;

fn main() {
    let mut a = BytesMut::from(&b"hello world"[..]);
    let mut b = a.split_off(5);

    // Ensure b becomes the unique owner of the backing storage
    drop(a);

    // Trigger overflow in new_cap + offset inside reserve
    b.reserve(usize::MAX - 6);

    // This call relies on the corrupted cap and may cause UB & HBO
    b.put_u8(b'h');
}
Workarounds

Users of BytesMut::reserve are only affected if integer overflow checks are configured to wrap. When integer overflow is configured to panic, this issue does not apply.

Severity

Unknown

References

This data is provided by OSV and the Rust Advisory Database (CC0 1.0).


Release Notes

tokio-rs/bytes (bytes)

v1.11.1

Compare Source

  • Fix integer overflow in BytesMut::reserve

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Never, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Feb 3, 2026

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: executor/Cargo.lock
Command failed: cargo update --config net.git-fetch-with-cli=true --manifest-path executor/Cargo.toml --package bytes@1.11.0 --precise 1.11.1
    Updating crates.io index
error: failed to get `wasmparser` as a dependency of package `genvm v0.1.0 (/tmp/renovate/repos/github/genlayerlabs/genvm/executor)`

Caused by:
  failed to load source for dependency `wasmparser`

Caused by:
  Unable to update /tmp/renovate/repos/github/genlayerlabs/genvm/executor/third-party/wasm-tools/crates/wasmparser

Caused by:
  failed to read `/tmp/renovate/repos/github/genlayerlabs/genvm/executor/third-party/wasm-tools/crates/wasmparser/Cargo.toml`

Caused by:
  No such file or directory (os error 2)

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

1 similar comment
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 3, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

  • 🔍 Trigger a full review

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant