Skip to content

Conversation

@gennaropalma
Copy link
Contributor

Add a description to make it clearer that this option only works with Enterprise Managed Users. This is as per migration friction 3294.

  • Did you write/update appropriate tests
  • Release notes updated (if appropriate)
  • Appropriate logging output
  • Issue linked
  • Docs updated (or issue created)
  • New package licenses are added to ThirdPartyNotices.txt (if applicable)

Add a description to make it clearer that this option only works with Enterprise Managed Users.
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 28, 2025 05:01
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR updates the CreateTeamCommandBase.cs file to add a clear description for the IdpGroup option, clarifying that it applies only to Enterprise Managed Users as noted in migration friction 3294.

  • Added a detailed description for the IdpGroup option.
  • Clarified usage constraints in the command description.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 28, 2025

Unit Test Results

  1 files    1 suites   10m 25s ⏱️
960 tests 960 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
961 runs  961 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit d0f55b4.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

public virtual Option<string> IdpGroup { get; } = new("--idp-group");

{
Description = "The Identity Provider Group to link the team to. For Enterprise Managed Users only."
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

there is an extra semi colon on line 19 that is a syntax error, once deleted the build should succeed.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 4, 2025

Code Coverage

Package Line Rate Branch Rate Complexity Health
ado2gh 72% 70% 712
Octoshift 83% 72% 1737
bbs2gh 83% 78% 663
gei 81% 72% 574
Summary 81% (7737 / 9603) 73% (1837 / 2519) 3686

@brianaj
Copy link
Collaborator

brianaj commented Dec 4, 2025

Closing in favor of #1467

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants