Skip to content

Conversation

@Kenasvarghese
Copy link

This PR introduces a Config type in the adkrest package to define
session, artifact, and agent dependencies.

As a follow-up to #415, adkrest should not directly depend on
launcher.Config. Defining a package-local configuration type provides
a clearer and more appropriate abstraction for REST integration.

Related issue: #418

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @Kenasvarghese, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refactors the configuration management within the adkrest package by introducing a dedicated Config type. This change aims to improve modularity and reduce tight coupling by ensuring the adkrest package manages its own dependencies (session, artifact, agent services) through a specific interface, rather than relying on a broader launcher.Config.

Highlights

  • New Configuration Type: Introduced a new Config type within the adkrest package to explicitly define its required dependencies, such as session, artifact, and agent services.
  • Dependency Decoupling: Decoupled the adkrest package from directly depending on launcher.Config, addressing a follow-up from issue Move restapi server controllers and routers to internal #415.
  • Improved Abstraction: The new package-local Config type provides a clearer and more appropriate abstraction for managing dependencies specific to REST integration.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a dedicated Config type for the adkrest package, successfully decoupling it from launcher.Config. This is an excellent change that improves modularity and clarifies the dependencies for the REST integration. The implementation is clean, correct, and effectively isolates the configuration needed by adkrest. No issues were found in the implementation.

@Kenasvarghese Kenasvarghese requested a review from rakyll December 17, 2025 01:17
rakyll
rakyll previously approved these changes Dec 17, 2025
Copy link
Member

@rakyll rakyll left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, cc @mazas-google @dpasiukevich to approve the breaking change.

@IAmSurajBobade
Copy link

@Kenasvarghese
Copy link
Author

Please Review @IAmSurajBobade

@Kenasvarghese
Copy link
Author

/gemini review

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a Config type for the adkrest package, successfully decoupling it from launcher.Config. The changes are well-implemented across the modified files, including updating the NewHandler function and its call sites. My main feedback is regarding the example in examples/rest/main.go, which appears to be missing the initialization for ArtifactService, potentially leading to runtime errors. I've provided a suggestion to address this.

@Kenasvarghese
Copy link
Author

/gemini review

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request effectively refactors the adkrest package to use its own Config type, successfully decoupling it from launcher.Config. This is a solid improvement for code modularity and clarity. My review focuses on enhancing the robustness of this new configuration by adding validation to prevent potential runtime panics from nil dependencies. The suggestions include adding a Validate method to the new Config struct, updating NewHandler to perform validation and return an error, and adjusting the call sites accordingly.

@Kenasvarghese
Copy link
Author

@rakyll @IAmSurajBobade @dpasiukevich Do I need to implement validation and error for the config

@Kenasvarghese Kenasvarghese requested a review from rakyll December 24, 2025 17:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants