Skip to content

Conversation

@dominik-burdzy
Copy link
Collaborator

Create a new task to iterate over Cloudera hosts and collect dynamic resource allocation of their services calling timeseries endpoint. It queries memory, cpu and disk I/O statistics in hourly manner and stores the results in service-resource-allocation.jsonl file.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 14, 2025

Code Coverage Report

Overall Project 61.7% 🍏
Files changed 100% 🍏

File Coverage
ClouderaServiceResourceAllocationChartTask.java 100% 🍏
ClouderaHostRAMChartTask.java 100% 🍏
ClouderaClusterCPUChartTask.java 100% 🍏
AbstractClouderaTimeSeriesTask.java 99.52% 🍏
ClouderaYarnApplicationTypeTask.java 94.83% 🍏
ClouderaManagerConnector.java 69.9% 🍏

Copy link
Member

@vladislav-sidorovich vladislav-sidorovich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good job

Copy link
Member

@zaldis zaldis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@dominik-burdzy dominik-burdzy force-pushed the feature/b455552691/cloudera-services-resource-allocation branch 3 times, most recently from 01a4fd3 to d4aa125 Compare November 18, 2025 12:27
@dominik-burdzy dominik-burdzy force-pushed the feature/b455552691/cloudera-services-resource-allocation branch from d4aa125 to 6b544f8 Compare December 15, 2025 13:01
Create a new task to iterate over Cloudera hosts and collect dynamic resource allocation of their services calling timeseries endpoint. It queries memory, cpu and disk throughput statistics in hourly manner and stores the results in `service-resource-allocation.jsonl` file.
@dominik-burdzy dominik-burdzy force-pushed the feature/b455552691/cloudera-services-resource-allocation branch from 6b544f8 to c0c7222 Compare January 5, 2026 09:22
@dominik-burdzy dominik-burdzy merged commit 99809cb into main Jan 5, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants