MoreObjects: Document requireNonNullElseGet in firstNonNull Javadoc#8196
Open
nickita-khylkouski wants to merge 1 commit intogoogle:masterfrom
Open
MoreObjects: Document requireNonNullElseGet in firstNonNull Javadoc#8196nickita-khylkouski wants to merge 1 commit intogoogle:masterfrom
nickita-khylkouski wants to merge 1 commit intogoogle:masterfrom
Conversation
Add mention of java.util.Objects.requireNonNullElseGet as the lazy evaluation alternative for Java 9+ users. Fixes google#6283
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
java.util.Objects.requireNonNullElseGetas the lazy evaluation alternative for Java 9+ users inMoreObjects.firstNonNullJavadocMotivation
The current Javadoc mentions
requireNonNullElsefor Java 9 users but doesn't mention the lazySupplier-based variantrequireNonNullElseGet. Per maintainer comment on the issue, this should be documented.Fixes #6283
Testing