PR #362 Review #440
PR #362 Review #440
Conversation
This commit adds a detailed technical review of PR #362 to REVIEW.md, covering functional correctness, adherence to Google Python standards, and suggested refactors. Co-authored-by: chalmerlowe <7291104+chalmerlowe@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
Summary of ChangesHello @chalmerlowe, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a detailed technical review of PR #362 for the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request adds a detailed technical review for another pull request. The review itself is of high quality, identifying a critical issue with logging configuration and correctly suggesting a fix and the addition of tests. My feedback focuses on further improving the clarity of the suggested changes and enhancing the completeness of the proposed test case to ensure no regressions are introduced.
| ```python | ||
| <<<<<<< SEARCH | ||
| _LOGGER = logging.getLogger(__name__) | ||
| _LOGGER.setLevel(logging.INFO) | ||
| ======= | ||
| _LOGGER = logging.getLogger(__name__) | ||
| >>>>>>> REPLACE | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The use of <<<<<<< SEARCH and >>>>>>> REPLACE is a bit unconventional for presenting code changes in a review document. For better readability and to adhere to a more standard format, consider using a diff code block. This makes it immediately clear what lines are being removed or added.
| ```python | |
| <<<<<<< SEARCH | |
| _LOGGER = logging.getLogger(__name__) | |
| _LOGGER.setLevel(logging.INFO) | |
| ======= | |
| _LOGGER = logging.getLogger(__name__) | |
| >>>>>>> REPLACE | |
| ``` | |
| _LOGGER = logging.getLogger(__name__) | |
| - _LOGGER.setLevel(logging.INFO) |
| @mock.patch("google_auth_oauthlib.flow.webbrowser", autospec=True) | ||
| def test_run_local_server_logs_url(self, webbrowser_mock, instance, mock_fetch_token, port, caplog): | ||
| auth_redirect_url = urllib.parse.urljoin( | ||
| f"http://localhost:{port}", self.REDIRECT_REQUEST_PATH | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| # Configure caplog to capture INFO logs | ||
| caplog.set_level(logging.INFO, logger="google_auth_oauthlib.flow") | ||
|
|
||
| with concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=1) as pool: | ||
| future = pool.submit(partial(instance.run_local_server, port=port)) | ||
|
|
||
| while not future.done(): | ||
| try: | ||
| requests.get(auth_redirect_url) | ||
| except requests.ConnectionError: | ||
| pass | ||
|
|
||
| future.result() | ||
|
|
||
| # Verify log message | ||
| assert "Please visit this URL" in caplog.text | ||
| assert instance.redirect_uri in caplog.text |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a great test case suggestion for verifying the new logging behavior. To make it even more robust and ensure no existing functionality is broken, consider also asserting that the original print functionality is preserved. This would guard against accidentally removing the console output for users who rely on it. You can achieve this by patching builtins.print, adding assertions for it, and renaming the test to reflect its more comprehensive nature.
@mock.patch("builtins.print")
@mock.patch("google_auth_oauthlib.flow.webbrowser", autospec=True)
def test_run_local_server_logs_and_prints_url(self, print_mock, webbrowser_mock, instance, mock_fetch_token, port, caplog):
auth_redirect_url = urllib.parse.urljoin(
f"http://localhost:{port}", self.REDIRECT_REQUEST_PATH
)
# Configure caplog to capture INFO logs
caplog.set_level(logging.INFO, logger="google_auth_oauthlib.flow")
with concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=1) as pool:
future = pool.submit(partial(instance.run_local_server, port=port))
while not future.done():
try:
requests.get(auth_redirect_url)
except requests.ConnectionError:
pass
future.result()
# Verify log message
assert "Please visit this URL" in caplog.text
assert instance.redirect_uri in caplog.text
# Verify print message
print_mock.assert_called_once()
assert "Please visit this URL" in print_mock.call_args[0][0]
assert instance.redirect_uri in print_mock.call_args[0][0]1 participant
Added detailed technical review of PR #362.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 6034124287517004733 started by @chalmerlowe