Skip to content

Conversation

@chalmerlowe
Copy link
Contributor

This PR addresses the issue where a timeout in run_local_server caused an AttributeError. It introduces a WSGITimeout exception that is raised when the server times out waiting for a callback. A regression test has been added to tests/unit/test_flow.py.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 14978887234858898738 started by @chalmerlowe

- Adds WSGITimeout exception to flow.py
- Raises WSGITimeout when run_local_server times out instead of crashing with AttributeError
- Adds unit test to verify timeout behavior

Co-authored-by: chalmerlowe <7291104+chalmerlowe@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the size: s Pull request size is small. label Jan 23, 2026
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @chalmerlowe, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refines the error handling within the OAuth callback process by introducing a dedicated WSGITimeout exception. This change ensures that when the local server fails to receive an authorization response within the specified timeout period, a more descriptive and actionable error is raised, improving the reliability and debuggability of the authentication flow.

Highlights

  • New Exception Type: Introduced a new WSGITimeout exception to specifically handle timeout scenarios when the local server is waiting for an OAuth callback, replacing a generic AttributeError.
  • Improved Error Handling: Modified the run_local_server function to explicitly check for a timeout condition and raise the WSGITimeout exception, providing clearer error diagnostics.
  • Documentation Update: Updated the docstring for run_local_server to reflect the new WSGITimeout exception that can be raised.
  • Regression Test: Added a new unit test, test_run_local_server_timeout, to ensure that the WSGITimeout exception is correctly raised when the server times out.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a WSGITimeout exception to provide a more meaningful error when the local server for the OAuth flow times out waiting for the callback. This is a good improvement over the previous behavior which resulted in an AttributeError. The changes include the new exception class, updated docstrings, and the logic to raise the exception on timeout. A new unit test has been added to cover this timeout scenario. The implementation is solid, and I have one suggestion to make the new test more robust.

Comment on lines +470 to +471
with pytest.raises(flow.WSGITimeout):
instance.run_local_server(timeout_seconds=1)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This test correctly verifies that a WSGITimeout is raised. To make it more robust, you could also assert that webbrowser.open() was called, as this happens before the server waits for the request and times out. This would ensure that part of the flow is also behaving as expected in the timeout scenario, consistent with other tests for run_local_server.

Suggested change
with pytest.raises(flow.WSGITimeout):
instance.run_local_server(timeout_seconds=1)
with pytest.raises(flow.WSGITimeout):
instance.run_local_server(timeout_seconds=1)
webbrowser_mock.get.assert_called_with(None)
webbrowser_mock.get.return_value.open.assert_called_once()

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size: s Pull request size is small.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant