-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
chore: make grafeas post processing script robust #15555
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @ohmayr, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request refines the Grafeas client's generation process by making its post-processing script more robust. It achieves this by updating regex patterns to precisely remove specific, likely deprecated or centralized, client configuration and mTLS-related code from the generated Python client libraries. This cleanup also includes the removal of associated unit tests, resulting in a leaner and more maintainable codebase. Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request aims to make the grafeas client post-processing script more robust by replacing literal string matches with regular expressions. While most of the changes achieve this goal effectively, one of the new regular expressions is too broad and unanchored, which could make the script more fragile. I've added a comment with a suggestion to improve its robustness.
| [\s\S]*?"credentialsType": None, | ||
| \s+\}, | ||
| \s+\) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This regular expression is too broad and not well-anchored. The [\s\S]*? will start matching right after the credentials argument in the __init__ method's signature, swallowing the rest of the signature and the docstring. This makes the match fragile and could lead to incorrect replacements if the code being modified changes.
To make this more robust, you should anchor the regex to more specific parts of the code. For example, you could match the full method signature up to ) -> None: literally, and then use a regex for the method body. A more robust before block would look something like this:
...
\ client_info: gapic_v1.client_info.ClientInfo = DEFAULT_CLIENT_INFO,
\ \) -> None:
[\s\S]*?"credentialsType": None,
\s+\},
\s+\This would ensure that the entire signature is matched literally before the regex part for the body begins.
Make the grafeas client post processing script more robust.