Skip to content

Conversation

@ospencer
Copy link
Member

@ospencer ospencer commented Mar 1, 2025

@ospencer ospencer self-assigned this Mar 1, 2025
@ospencer ospencer force-pushed the oscar/117 branch 3 times, most recently from e8ff14a to 7cc3006 Compare May 18, 2025 02:44
@ospencer ospencer changed the base branch from oscar/117 to master October 29, 2025 16:24
Copy link
Member

@spotandjake spotandjake left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This still needs to rebase and we need to pull out the changes that are not related to 118 however the changes in src/ and test/ make sense to me looking at the changes to binaryen.

@ospencer ospencer changed the base branch from master to main October 30, 2025 15:19
@ospencer ospencer marked this pull request as ready for review October 30, 2025 16:22
Copy link
Member

@spotandjake spotandjake left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

Note:
We are not planning to, but if we are merging this into main, we should probably use the local esy package.

Opam ci still needs to pass after the releases are merged as well.

@ospencer ospencer merged commit 6a5d0e8 into main Nov 1, 2025
24 checks passed
@ospencer ospencer deleted the oscar/118 branch November 1, 2025 14:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants