Skip to content

Update eslint monorepo to v9.39.4#2343

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
renovate/eslint-monorepo
Open

Update eslint monorepo to v9.39.4#2343
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
renovate/eslint-monorepo

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 20, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
@eslint/js (source) 9.39.29.39.4 age confidence
eslint (source) 9.39.29.39.4 age confidence

Release Notes

eslint/eslint (@​eslint/js)

v9.39.4

Compare Source

v9.39.3

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

  • 791bf8d fix: restore TypeScript 4.0 compatibility in types (#​20504) (sethamus)

Chores

eslint/eslint (eslint)

v9.39.4

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

Documentation

Chores

v9.39.3

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

  • 791bf8d fix: restore TypeScript 4.0 compatibility in types (#​20504) (sethamus)

Chores


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from h3poteto as a code owner February 20, 2026 15:39
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/eslint-monorepo branch from 61696bf to 8d4ea54 Compare March 5, 2026 18:09
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/eslint-monorepo branch from 8d4ea54 to c52e18a Compare March 6, 2026 22:34
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update eslint monorepo to v9.39.3 Update eslint monorepo to v9.39.4 Mar 6, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants