Skip to content

Conversation

@ArcaEge
Copy link
Collaborator

@ArcaEge ArcaEge commented Dec 19, 2025

No description provided.

@ArcaEge ArcaEge merged commit f6f8d4b into main Dec 19, 2025
2 checks passed
});
}

const token = decrypt(queriedUser.idvToken);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bug: The decrypt() call for the idvToken is not wrapped in a try-catch block. If decryption fails, it will cause an unhandled exception.
Severity: HIGH | Confidence: High

🔍 Detailed Analysis

The decrypt() function on line 286 is called to decrypt the idvToken. This function is designed to throw an error if decryption fails, for example, due to a key rotation or data corruption. Unlike other parts of the action which handle potential failures gracefully by returning a fail() response, this call is not wrapped in a try-catch block. An unhandled exception here will crash the server action, resulting in a 500 error for the user instead of a clear error message.

💡 Suggested Fix

Wrap the decrypt(queriedUser.idvToken) call in a try-catch block. In the catch block, log the error and return a fail() response with an appropriate error message, similar to how other failures are handled in the same function.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agent
Review the code at the location below. A potential bug has been identified by an AI
agent.
Verify if this is a real issue. If it is, propose a fix; if not, explain why it's not
valid.

Location: src/routes/dashboard/admin/admin/users/[id]/+page.server.ts#L286

Potential issue: The `decrypt()` function on line 286 is called to decrypt the
`idvToken`. This function is designed to throw an error if decryption fails, for
example, due to a key rotation or data corruption. Unlike other parts of the action
which handle potential failures gracefully by returning a `fail()` response, this call
is not wrapped in a `try-catch` block. An unhandled exception here will crash the server
action, resulting in a 500 error for the user instead of a clear error message.

Did we get this right? 👍 / 👎 to inform future reviews.
Reference ID: 7737311

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants