-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
feat: add check_interval for the hybrid solver #459
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @henry2004y, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a check_interval parameter to the adaptive hybrid solver, which is a good performance optimization to reduce the frequency of expensive adiabaticity checks and potential method switching. However, a medium-severity vulnerability was identified: a missing input validation on the new check_interval parameter could lead to a denial of service if a user provides a value of zero, causing a division-by-zero error. It is recommended to add a check to ensure this parameter is a positive integer to prevent potential runtime errors and improve robustness.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #459 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 81.80% 82.04% +0.23%
==========================================
Files 21 21
Lines 2056 2061 +5
==========================================
+ Hits 1682 1691 +9
+ Misses 374 370 -4 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Benchmark Results (Julia v1)Time benchmarks
Memory benchmarks
|
check_intervalparameter for the hybrid solver to reduce the frequency of adiabaticity check and method switching